Skip to main content

Bartel v. Walsh (In re Bartel)

Bartel v. Walsh (In re Bartel)

Ruling
There are no exceptions to criminal prosecution exception from stay.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff, the chapter 7 debtor, brought adversary claims seeking damages and injunctive relief against defendants, a former district attorney (D.A.) and a state police officer, alleging they violated the automatic stay by instituting criminal proceedings against him and seizing his financial records pursuant to a search warrant, depriving him of the protection of the automatic stay. The D.A. and the officer moved for summary judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bartel v. Walsh (In re Bartel) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 16, 2008 , LexisNexis #1108-059