Skip to main content

In re Lane

In re Lane

Ruling
Debtors required to file amended schedules and plan due to miscalculation on Form 22C.
Procedural posture

Respondent creditor filed an objection to the confirmation of the chapter 13 plan regarding petitioner debtors. The debtors were above median income debtors with an applicable commitment period of five years, pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325(b)(4). The court conducted a hearing on the objection.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Lane Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 19, 2008 , LexisNexis #1108-056