In re Dana Corp.
Oct
03
2007
Ruling
Government's CERCLA claims were not subject to mandatory withdrawal.
Procedural posture
The United States of America ("Government") moved for a stay of the debtors'objection to the Government's proofs of claim and the related estimation procedures pending a decision from the district court on the Government's motion to withdraw the reference. The Government brought its claims under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 ("CERCLA").
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Dana Corp. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: