Skip to main content

In re Love

In re Love

Ruling
Extension of stay denied to debtor whose prior case was dismissed for non-payment and who was unable to make plan payments due to theft of money by third party during hospitalization.
Procedural posture

Movant debtor sought to extend the stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3)(B). Respondent creditor filed an objection.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Love Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on March 23, 2006 , LexisNexis #1106-007