Skip to main content

§ 727(b)

Thomas v. Metal Partners LLC (In re Thomas)

Ruling
Unscheduled prepetition contingent claim was not discharged.
Issue(s)
Did creditor holding unscheduled, prepetition contingent claim violate discharge injunction by filing collection suit .

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Thomas v. Metal Partners LLC (In re Thomas) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 30, 2013 , LexisNexis #1013-058

In re Stillwell

Ruling
Claim based on debtor's objections under guaranty was discharged in no asset case despite lack of notice to creditor.
Procedural posture

A chapter 7 debtor sought a determination as to whether certain obligations under a guaranty to the creditor were discharged under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(b) despite the lack of notice to the creditor in a no-asset case.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Stillwell Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 10, 2012 , LexisNexis #0312-026

Thebes v. Pennsylvania Dept of Env.. Prot. (In re Thebes)

Ruling
State department of environmental protection's cleanup order was not a claim and not dischargeable.
Procedural posture

Chapter 7 debtor sought a ruling that injunctive orders issued against him by defendant, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), were dischargeable claims under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(b). The DEP filed a motion for summary judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Thebes v. Pennsylvania Dept of Env.. Prot. (In re Thebes) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 19, 2011 , LexisNexis #1111-061

Hutchinson v. Republic Bank & Trust Co. (In re Hutchinson)

Ruling
Claim for negligent preparation of mortgage that arose prepetition but was not discovered until after discharge was barred.
Procedural posture

Debtor brought an adversary proceeding against defendant mortgagee seeking a determination that any liability arising from the debtor's allegedly negligent conduct in preparing a mortgage for the mortgagee were previously discharged in the debtor's bankruptcy. The debtor moved for summary judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hutchinson v. Republic Bank & Trust Co. (In re Hutchinson) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 12, 2010 , LexisNexis #0910-035

Heilman v. Heilman (In re Heilman)

Ruling
Hold harmless provision in postdischarge divorce decree did not revive discharged prepetition debt.
Procedural posture

Former spouse of appellee bankruptcy debtor brought an adversary proceeding against the debtor alleging that, despite the debtor's prior discharge, the debtor was required to indemnify the spouse for a loan debt to the spouse's parents pursuant to a subsequent divorce decree. The spouse appealed the judgment in favor of the debtor entered in the bankruptcy court for the Eastern District of Washington.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Heilman v. Heilman (In re Heilman) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 26, 2010 , LexisNexis #0710-104

In re Lamug

Ruling
Case dismissed where totality of circumstances showed debtors had ability to pay substantial portion of debt.
Procedural posture

The United States Trustee filed a motion to dismiss chapter 7 debtors' bankruptcy case pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 707(b)(3).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Lamug Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 18, 2009 , LexisNexis #0509-127

Babin v. Powell (In re Powell)

Ruling
Confirmation reversed due to precedent that debtors could not claim ownership expense deduction for vehicles owned free and clear.
Procedural posture

Chapter 13 trustee objected to the confirmation of appellee debtors' plans on the theory that they were not submitting all projected disposable income to the repayment of creditors. The Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Arkansas overruled the objections and confirmed the debtors' plans. The trustee appealed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Babin v. Powell (In re Powell) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 02, 2008 , LexisNexis #0908-123

In re Binninger

Ruling
Presumption of abuse applied where extra income due to debtor's overtime occurred regularly and possible upcoming retirement was not mandatory.
Procedural posture

The United States Trustee ("UST") moved to dismiss the debtors'chapter 7 case for abuse under 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(1). Alternatively, the UST argued that the petition be dismissed under 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(3)(B), the totality of the circumstances test.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Binninger Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 19, 2007 , LexisNexis #1107-118

In re Hartley

Ruling
Reopening of no asset, no bar date case to include creditors with postpetion claims not necessary as such claims would not be discharged.
Procedural posture

The debtors filed an ex parte motion to reopen their chapter 7 case without payment of the filing fee to reopen.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Hartley Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 01, 2007 , LexisNexis #1107-034

Hermosilla v. Hermosilla (In re Hermosilla)

Ruling
Postpetition debt arising out of postpetition events was not affected by discharge.
Procedural posture

The matter before the court was the motion for summary judgment of plaintiff, debtor's stepmother, on the count which she alleged under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6) based upon fraudulent transfer of property from her ex-husband to debtor, her stepson. Debtor cross-moved for summary judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hermosilla v. Hermosilla (In re Hermosilla) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on April 19, 2007 , LexisNexis #0607-033