Skip to main content

§ 727(b)(2)(A)

Babin v. Powell (In re Powell)

Ruling
Confirmation reversed due to precedent that debtors could not claim ownership expense deduction for vehicles owned free and clear.
Procedural posture

Chapter 13 trustee objected to the confirmation of appellee debtors' plans on the theory that they were not submitting all projected disposable income to the repayment of creditors. The Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Arkansas overruled the objections and confirmed the debtors' plans. The trustee appealed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Babin v. Powell (In re Powell) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 02, 2008 , LexisNexis #0908-123