Skip to main content

§ 523(a)(1)(C)

United States v Acker (In re Acker)

Ruling
Tax debt beyond three year look back period was nondischargeable due to willful evasion by debtor.
Procedural posture

United States of America ("Government") filed an adversary proceeding against defendant chapter 7 debtor, seeking a determination, inter alia, that the debtor's federal income tax liability for tax years 1998 through 2006 created debt that was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(1)(C). The court granted partial summary judgment in favor of the Government and tried issues that were not resolved by summary judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of United States v Acker (In re Acker) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 28, 2010 , LexisNexis #1110-017

Lyon v. United States IRS (In re Lyon)

Ruling
Tax liability was nondischargeable where debtor repeatedly failed to file returns and evaded payment.
Procedural posture

Chapter 7 debtor filed a complaint against defendant, the United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS), seeking a determination that his tax liabilities arising from his failure to pay taxes between 1999 and 2002 were dischargeable. The IRS contended that the tax liability should not be discharged because the debtor willfully evaded payment pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(1)(C). The IRS filed a motion for summary judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Lyon v. United States IRS (In re Lyon) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 24, 2010 , LexisNexis #0910-078

Bryen v. United States (In re Bryen)

Ruling
IRS tax debt that debtor willfully attempted to evade or defeat was nondischargeable.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff-debtor moved to reopen his case and brought an adversary complaint, seeking a determination that his debt to defendant United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for unpaid taxes had been discharged in September 2004, in his Chapter 7 filing. The IRS asserted that the debt was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(1)(C).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bryen v. United States (In re Bryen) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 13, 2010 , LexisNexis #0910-033

United States v. Wroblewski

Ruling
Debtor's federal tax liabilities were not discharged in bankruptcy.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff sued defendant taxpayers, a husband and a wife, to reduce to judgment federal income tax assessments against them, individually and jointly, and to foreclose tax liens against real property owned by the taxpayers. The Government moved for summary judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of United States v. Wroblewski Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 16, 2009 , LexisNexis #0209-099

Guben v. United States (In re Guben)

Ruling
IRS debt was nondischargeable where debtor had paid for education, vacations and a noted art collection but not paid taxes.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff debtor brought an adversary claim against defendant creditor the United States (IRS), seeking a determination that her tax liabilities for about nine years were dischargeable, having grown with interest and penalties to the sum of $ 319,271. The IRS asserted that the debtor had attempted to evade payment of the taxes, and, as a result, her tax debt should not be discharged pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(1)(C).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Guben v. United States (In re Guben) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 14, 2008 , LexisNexis #1108-120

United States v. Mixon (In re Mixon)

Ruling
Tax debt was nondischargeable due to debtor's willful evasion attempts.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff U.S. brought a complaint against defendant chapter 7 debtors, seeking a determination that the debtors were indebted to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for unpaid federal income taxes, to recover the debt from the debtors, along with interest, and a determination that the debt was excepted from discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(1)(C) because the debtors had willfully attempted in any manner to evade or defeat such tax.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of United States v. Mixon (In re Mixon) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 13, 2008 , LexisNexis #0608-044

Geiger v. IRS (In re Geiger)

Ruling
Debtor's IRS liability was dischargeable although debtor spouse's liability was nondischargeable due to willful avoidance attempts.
Procedural posture

Debtors, a married couple, filed a complaint against defendant IRS for a determination that the husband's tax liabilities for 1993, 1995, 1997, and 1998 and the couple's joint obligations for 2000 and 2001 were properly discharged. The IRS opposed the claim on the ground that debtor husband had willfully attempted to defeat or evade payment of taxes within the meaning of 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(1)(C) but offered no evidence as to the wife.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Geiger v. IRS (In re Geiger) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 28, 2008 , LexisNexis #0608-007

Parks v. Krause (In re Krause)

Ruling
Income tax debt excepted from discharge due to debtor's willful evasion.
Procedural posture

Plaintiffs, the U.S. and the chapter 7 trustee, filed an adversary proceeding against defendants, the debtor and his brother, seeking a determination that the debtor's substantial income tax debt should be excepted from discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(1)(C), that trusts for the benefit of the debtor's children should be declared to be the nominees of the debtor, and that the debtor made several fraudulent transfers.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Parks v. Krause (In re Krause) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 21, 2008 , LexisNexis #0508-099

Volpe v. IRS (In re Volpe)

Ruling
Taxes were nondischargeable due to debtor's willful evasion attempts.
Procedural posture

Debtor sued defendant, the IRS, for a declaratory judgment that debtor's federal tax debts for 1997, 1998 and 1999 were dischargeable in connection with his chapter 7 bankruptcy case. At issue was whether those liabilities were properly excepted from discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(1)(C) due to what the IRS alleged to be debtor's willful attempt to evade paying his taxes.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Volpe v. IRS (In re Volpe) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 23, 2007 , LexisNexis #1107-061

Hamm v. United States (In re Hamm)

Ruling
Tax debt was not discharged in either of well-to-do debtors'two bankruptcies given evidence of efforts to evade or defeat taxes.
Procedural posture

Debtors, a physician and his spouse, brought an adversary proceeding seeking a determination that their liability for federal income taxes to the IRS over a five-year period had been discharged in a prior chapter 7 case. At issue was whether the government had shown that debtors willfully attempted in any manner to evade or defeat the tax so as to trigger nondischargeability per 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(1)(C).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hamm v. United States (In re Hamm) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on November 17, 2006 , LexisNexis #0107-091