Skip to main content

§ 521(a)(2)(A)

Gregory, In re

Ruling
Debtor was not required to surrender property to a creditor where debtor's expression ofintention was mere relinquishment and not surrendering the property. (Bankr. W.D. Mo.)
Issue(s)
Debtor's Duties; Required Acts; Where Individual Debtor’s Debt is Secured by Property of the Estate; Statement of Intention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Gregory, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 14, 2017 , LexisNexis #0717-068

In re Woide

Ruling
Case reopened to allow creditor to seek to compel surrender of property. (Bankr. M.D. Fla.)
Issue(s)
Debtor's Duties; Required Acts; Where Individual Debtor’s Debt is Secured by

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Woide Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 21, 2016 , LexisNexis #1216-007

In re Elkouby

Ruling
Where debtor indicated intent to abandon property, the property was abandoned back to debtor upon closing of case.
Issue(s)
What was effect of debtor's expressed intention to surrender property after closing of the case?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Elkouby Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 29, 2016 , LexisNexis #0316-083

In re Trussel

Ruling
Debtor could not be compelled to reaffirm debt in accordance with stated intention absent bad faith.
Issue(s)
Could debtor who had stated intention to surrender property be compelled to do so?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Trussel Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 05, 2015 , LexisNexis #0615-049

Samson v. Western Capital Partners LLC (In re Blixseth)

Ruling
Stay terminated as to all personal property securing creditor's claim, not just scheduled property, where debtor failed to file a statement of intention.
Procedural posture

Appellant, the trustee in a chapter 7 case, filed a motion in bankruptcy court to enforce the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C.S. § 362 against appellee creditor. The bankruptcy court denied the motion, and the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit affirmed. The trustee appealed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Samson v. Western Capital Partners LLC (In re Blixseth) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 21, 2012 , LexisNexis #0712-046

In re Gentry

Ruling
Statement of intention to surrender property did not prevent debtor from claiming exemption.
Procedural posture

A chapter 7 trustee objected to a debtor's amended claim of homestead exemption under Fla. Const. art. X, § 4(a)(1) on the grounds that the debtor, having indicated his intent to surrender the property on the petition date, was not eligible for the exemption on that date.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Gentry Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 15, 2011 , LexisNexis #1211-011

Noland v. HSBC Auto Fin. Inc. (In re Baine)

Ruling
Creditor could repossess vehicle despite improperly perfected security interest where debtor did not follow through on stated intention to surrender and stay had terminated.
Procedural posture

Plaintiffs, two debtors and a chapter 7 trustee, filed a complaint seeking avoidance of defendant creditor's unperfected security interest in a truck and seeking damages for violation of the automatic stay arising from the creditor's repossession of the truck. The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Noland v. HSBC Auto Fin. Inc. (In re Baine) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 09, 2008 , LexisNexis #1008-043

In re Moustafi

Ruling
Bankruptcy court refused to approve reaffirmation agreement that was not in best interests of debtor.
Procedural posture

After debtor, who had filed a chapter 7 proceeding, timely filed a statement of intention and entered into a reaffirmation agreement with a creditor that held a security interest in her car, court approval was sought. At issue was whether the reaffirmation agreement was properly approved, whether debtor could retain the car even if the court denied approval of the agreement, and the effect of 11 U.S.C. §§ 362(h) and 521(d) thereon.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Moustafi Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on June 04, 2007 , LexisNexis #0807-011

In re Hinson

Ruling
Ipso facto clause in motor vehicle purchase contract was not enforceable where debtor gave timely notice of intention to reaffirm debt.
Procedural posture

Movant debtor filed a motion for contempt against respondent creditor for attempting to recover attorney's fees that the debtor was not required to pay.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Hinson Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on September 11, 2006 , LexisNexis #1106-010