Skip to main content

§ 521(a)(1)(B)

In re Reynolds

Ruling
Dismissal for failure to file payment advices not required given other evidence of payment received.
Procedural posture

A chapter 13 trustee requested dismissal of the bankruptcy case due to the debtor's failure to timely file his pay stubs, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 521(a)(1)(B)(iv).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Reynolds Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on June 05, 2007 , LexisNexis #0807-009

Beacher v. Pena (In re Beacher)

Ruling
Filing of Form B22A not required where debts are not primarily consumer debts.
Procedural posture

Chapter 7 bankruptcy debtors moved to excuse filing a Form B22A calculation to determine whether a presumption of abuse arose, and other chapter 7 debtors in a separate case moved to vacate a dismissal of their case for failing to file a timely Form B22A. All of the debtors asserted that the requirement to file Form B22A did not apply since their debt was not primarily consumer debt, and the bankruptcy courts conducted a joint hearing.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Beacher v. Pena (In re Beacher) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
opinion summary, case decided on January 26, 2007 , LexisNexis #0307-042

In re Moates

Ruling
Debtors whose debts were not primarily consumer debts were not required to file a statement of current monthly income as the filing of schedules I and J provided redundant information and, thus, satisfied that requirement.
Procedural posture

Debtors in two bankruptcy cases submitted to the court the question of whether they were required under 11 U.S.C. § 521(a)(1)(B)(v), as individual debtors whose debts were primarily business debts, to file a statement of current monthly income. The question was before the court for decision.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Moates Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on January 27, 2006 , LexisNexis #0206-058