Skip to main content

§ 521(a)(1)(B)

In re Long

Ruling
Debtor's request to excuse filing of Schedules I and J due to one time retirement account withdrawal denied.
Procedural posture

Debtors filed a petition under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code, and they asked the court to excuse them from duties they had under 11 U.S.C.S. §§ 521(a)(1)(B)(ii) and 101(10A)(A)(i) to file the form for reporting their monthly income (Schedule I), the form for reporting their monthly expenses (Schedule J), and the form for reporting their monthly disposable income (Official Bankr. Form 22).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Long Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 08, 2010 , LexisNexis #1110-045

In re Ferro

Ruling
Dismissal vacated where debtor's counsel failed to properly advise debtor on bringing failure to receive payment advices to the attention of the court.
Procedural posture

The court held a hearing on debtor's emergency motion to vacate chapter 13 dismissal order. Two individuals opposed the motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Ferro Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 03, 2009 , LexisNexis #0110-080

In re Wassah

Ruling
Court refused to vacate dismissal of debtors' cases for failure to file required documentation.
Procedural posture

Two debtors filed motions to vacate the orders dismissing each of their respective bankruptcy cases.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Wassah Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 17, 2009 , LexisNexis #1009-044

In re Ruiz

Ruling
Debtor's failure to disclose property at creditor's meeting that it later claimed as exempt did not constitute bad faith.
Procedural posture

The chapter 7 trustee objected to an amended exemption of real property claimed by debtors. The trustee contended that debtors were judicially estopped from claiming the exemption based on the fact that debtors did not disclose the property until after the trustee did his own research and inquired about the property at the meeting of creditors, and that debtors amended their exemptions in bad faith.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Ruiz Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 26, 2009 , LexisNexis #0809-007

In re Hoff

Ruling
Filing of Schedule I excused to allow court to set current monthly income of debtors with recent involuntary decrease in income.
Procedural posture

The debtors brought a motion to excuse the requirement, under 11 U.S.C.S. § 521(a)(1)(B), of filing a Schedule I, and for setting an alternative date for determining current monthly income under 11 U.S.C.S. § 101(10A)(A)(ii). A creditor objected to excusing the required filing of Schedule I.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Hoff Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 23, 2009 , LexisNexis #0509-114

Segarra-Miranda v. Acosta-Rivera (In re Acosta-Rivera)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court may excuse debtor's compliance with disclosure requirements.
Procedural posture

Appellees, debtors, filed a joint chapter 7 petition. When appellant trustee proposed settlement of the debtors' chose in action, the debtors moved for dismissal under 11 U.S.C.S. § 521(i)(2). The bankruptcy court denied the debtors' motion to dismiss and excused the detailed disclosure by ordering the debtors to do "otherwise" under § 521(a)(1)(B). The United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico reversed. The trustee appealed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Segarra-Miranda v. Acosta-Rivera (In re Acosta-Rivera) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 19, 2009 , LexisNexis #0309-115

In re Scalise

Ruling
Case dismissed due to debtor's failure to provide paystub covering petition date.
Procedural posture

The trustee filed a motion to dismiss the debtor's chapter 7 bankruptcy case for failure to comply with 11 U.S.C.S. § 521(a)(1)(B)(iv) of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Scalise Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 30, 2008 , LexisNexis #0109-011

In re Kruitbosch

Ruling
Debtor's failure to download pay stub from employer's web site for filing as payment advice resulted in dismissal.
Procedural posture

A chapter 13 trustee questioned the sufficiency of a debtor's filing of payment advices under 11 U.S.C. § 521(a)(1)(B)(iv).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Kruitbosch Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 29, 2007 , LexisNexis #1107-046

In re Bonner

Ruling
Debtor's case dismissed for failure to timely file payment advice despite good faith effort to comply.
Procedural posture

Movant, the chapter 7 trustee, asked the court to dismiss a chapter 7 petition filed by debtors, a married couple. The motion was based on debtors'alleged failure to comply with the requirement in 11 U.S.C. § 521(a)(1)(B)(iv) that they file copies of all evidence of payments received from any employer during the 60 days prior to the filing of their bankruptcy petition.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bonner Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on August 17, 2007 , LexisNexis #0907-111

In re Neil

Ruling
Sixty-day period for filing payment advices does not include day of filing.
Procedural posture

The chapter 13 trustee filed an objection to confirmation of the debtors'chapter 13 plan on the ground that the husband debtor (debtor) failed to timely file all pay advices required by 11 U.S.C. § 521(a)(1)(B)(iv). The issue was whether the day of filing was included in calculating the 60 days worth of payment advices that the debtor was required to file under 11 U.S.C. § 521(a)(1)(B)(iv).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Neil Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 09, 2007 , LexisNexis #1107-075