Skip to main content

§ 510(c)

Posey v. Kinkaid (In re Kinkaid)

Ruling
Divorce decree did not extinguish prior lien on debtor's property or entitle former spouse holding second lien to equitable subordination of the prior lien.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor objected to (i) dischargeability of her debt, and (ii) defendant debtor receiving a discharge in the underlying bankruptcy. Also, the creditor sought a determination that her lien on certain real property owned by debtor was the first lien. Alternatively, to the extent that the court concluded that defendants' lien on that property was the senior lien, she sought subordination under 11 U.S.C.S. § 510(c). A trial was held.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Posey v. Kinkaid (In re Kinkaid) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 18, 2011 , LexisNexis #0311-118

Friesen v. Seacoast Capital Partners II LP (In re QuVis Inc.)

Ruling
Small business investment company was not an insider so that secured claim could not be subordinated.
Procedural posture

Noteholders filed an adversary proceeding against defendant, a Small Business Investment Company ("SBIC"), seeking an order pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 510(c) to subordinate a claim the SBIC filed against a chapter 11 debtor's bankruptcy estate. The SBIC filed a motion for summary judgment creditor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Friesen v. Seacoast Capital Partners II LP (In re QuVis Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on February 18, 2011 , LexisNexis #0411-009

Riley v. Tencara LLC (In re Wolverine Proctor & Schwartz LLC)

Ruling
Creditor's claim characterized as debt and could not be equitably subordinated absent evidence of injurious conduct.
Procedural posture

Chapter 7 trustee filed an action against creditor seeking to recharacterize the creditor's secured debt as equity or, in the alternative, to equitably subordinate its claim to those of all other creditors under 11 U.S.C.S. § 510(c).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Riley v. Tencara LLC (In re Wolverine Proctor & Schwartz LLC) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on January 21, 2011 , LexisNexis #0211-078

8699 Biscayne LLC v. Indigo Real Estate LLC (In re 8699 Biscayne LLC)

Ruling
Motion to dismiss debtor's equitable subordination proceeding against builder denied.
Procedural posture

Defendant builders filed a motion to dismiss the adversary action filed by plaintiff debtor. The builder defendants sought to dismiss the equitable subordination and usury counts in the complaint.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of 8699 Biscayne LLC v. Indigo Real Estate LLC (In re 8699 Biscayne LLC) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on April 02, 2010 , LexisNexis #0610-114

Speth v. Whitham Farms Feedyard LP (In re Sunbelt Grain WKS LLC)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court properly held that equitable subordination did not apply to give buyer superior interest to bank.
Procedural posture

In a chapter 7 adversary proceeding, appellant creditor challenged a ruling of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas granting summary judgment to appellee bank and finding that the bank's security interest in the debtor's grain inventory was superior to that of the creditor. The debtor operated storage facilities that it used in buying and storing grain for farmers.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Speth v. Whitham Farms Feedyard LP (In re Sunbelt Grain WKS LLC) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on March 31, 2010 , LexisNexis #0610-048

Kaler v. Bala (In re Racing Servs. Inc.)

Ruling
Equitable subordination of claim properly vacated after underlying criminal conviction was reversed.
Procedural posture

Appellant bankruptcy trustee sought review of a decision from the bankruptcy appellate panel for the eighth circuit (BAP), which affirmed an order by the bankruptcy court granting, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(5), appellee claimant's motion to vacate an earlier order subordinating her claim for administrative expenses.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Kaler v. Bala (In re Racing Servs. Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on July 02, 2009 , LexisNexis #0809-029

Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors v. Suisse (In re Yellowstone Mt. Club LLC)

Ruling
Secured creditor's claim equitably subordinated on basis of overreaching and predatory lending practices.
Procedural posture

Defendants, the unsecured creditors' committee and other creditors, moved to have the rights of the principal secured creditor and its secured claim of $232 million equitably subordinated, pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 510(c), The court entered an abbreviated and limited interim ruling for purposes of facilitating the upcoming auction of the debtors' assets.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors v. Suisse (In re Yellowstone Mt. Club LLC) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on May 13, 2009 , LexisNexis #0909-083

Cadleway Props. V. Andrews (In re Andrews)

Ruling
Creditor's subrogation claim against debtor's spouse rendered moot by consummation of settlement agreement.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor filed an adversary proceeding against defendant, the wife of a chapter 7 debtor, seeking an order under 11 U.S.C.S. § 510(c) which subordinated a claim the wife filed against her husband's bankruptcy estate to claims filed by other creditors. The bankruptcy court issued an order that subordinated the wife's claim, and the wife appealed. The district court reversed the bankruptcy court's order and remanded the case.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Cadleway Props. V. Andrews (In re Andrews) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 02, 2009 , LexisNexis #0709-028

Plaza Equities LLC v. Panker (In re Copperfield Invs. LLC)

Ruling
Settlement of dispute over debtor's interest in mortgages approved.
Procedural posture

A chapter 11 trustee filed a motion under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9019 to approve a settlement agreement with a creditor. A group of entities holding the largest claims against the estate (entities) conditionally objected to the approval of the settlement. The entities contended that the settlement was only appropriate if the chapter 11 plan was confirmed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Plaza Equities LLC v. Panker (In re Copperfield Invs. LLC) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on February 26, 2009 , LexisNexis #0509-113

SI Restructuring Inc. v. Faulkner (In re SI Restructuring Inc.)

Ruling
Equitable subordination of secured claims reversed.
Procedural posture

Appellants sought review of an order of the District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division, affirming a bankruptcy court's order invoking equitable subordination pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 510(c), which effectively converted secured claims filed by appellants to unsecured claims for the purpose of any distributions.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of SI Restructuring Inc. v. Faulkner (In re SI Restructuring Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on June 20, 2008 , LexisNexis #0708-099