Skip to main content

§ 502(g)

Kissimmee Condos P'ship, LLC, In re

Ruling
Bankruptcy court awarded attorneys' fees and costs to the creditor as the prevailing partypursuant to the attorneys' fee provision in the purchase and sale contract. (Bankr. M.D. Fla.)
Issue(s)
Allowance of Claims or Interests; Rejection of Executory Contracts or Unexpired Leases.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Kissimmee Condos P'ship, LLC, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on September 29, 2023 , LexisNexis #0124-060

Kissimmee Condos P'ship, LLC, In re

Ruling
Bankruptcy court awarded attorneys' fees and costs to the creditor as the prevailing partypursuant to the attorneys' fee provision in the purchase and sale contract. (Bankr. M.D. Fla.)
Issue(s)
Allowance of Claims or Interests; Rejection of Executory Contracts or Unexpired Leases.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Kissimmee Condos P'ship, LLC, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on September 29, 2023 , LexisNexis #0124-060

Taunton Mun. Lighting Plant v. Enron (In re Enron Corp.)

Ruling
Former version of section 502(g) clearly required damages to be calculated as of day prior to petition date in which case creditor utility suffered no damages.
Procedural posture

Appellant, a municipal public power utility, sought review of an order of the bankruptcy court disallowing and expunging the utility's proof of claim filed against appellee debtor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Taunton Mun. Lighting Plant v. Enron (In re Enron Corp.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on August 23, 2006 , LexisNexis #0906-079

In re Enron Corp.

Ruling
Objection to a proof of claim for contractual damages was sustained where the Code required that damages'calculation be fixed as of a prefiling date not as of the actual contract rejection date, which was postfiling.
Procedural posture

Chapter 11 debtors objected to claimant's proof of claim.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Enron Corp. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on September 21, 2005 , LexisNexis #0106-115