Skip to main content

§ 362(c)

In re Washington

Ruling
Stay imposed in debtor's third case filed within one year due to rebuttal of presumption of bad faith.
Procedural posture

A chapter 13 debtor filed a motion to impose the automatic stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(c)(4).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Washington Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 23, 2012 , LexisNexis #0312-111

In re Rodriguez

Ruling
Stay extended in debtor's second chapter 11 case in one year given preponderance of evidence that plan would be confirmed and fully performed.
Procedural posture

Chapter 11 debtors filed a motion to extend the automatic stay as to all creditors. A bank holding promissory notes secured by real property objected.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Rodriguez Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 21, 2011 , LexisNexis #0212-044

Miller v. Kelly

Ruling
Motion for attorneys' fees and sanctions subject to thirty day stay in debtor's second bankruptcy case.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff bankruptcy debtor sued defendant for libel. After the claim was dismissed for failure to prosecute, defendant moved for attorney's fees and sanctions. The debtor moved to postpone or strike defendant's motion as barred by the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C.S. § 362.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Miller v. Kelly Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 04, 2011 , LexisNexis #1111-110

In re Mendez

Ruling
Order issued in case with substantially consummated plan to provide relief from quarterly fees.
Procedural posture

A Chapter 11 debtor filed a motion to administratively close his case in order to avoid the hardship of quarterly fees owed to the U.S. trustee (UST) under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1930(a)(6). The Chapter 11 plan was already confirmed and payments to creditors had commenced.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Mendez Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 26, 2011 , LexisNexis #1111-109

In Storozhenko

Ruling
Stay remained in effect with respect to prepetition civil contempt judgment that had not yet been held nondischargeable.
Procedural posture

A state court receiver filed a motion seeking a determination that the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(a) was not in effect to preclude him from attempting to collect a pre-petition civil contempt judgment against a Chapter 7 debtor from property that was not part of the bankruptcy estate.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In Storozhenko Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 16, 2011 , LexisNexis #1011-038

In re Fitzpatrick

Ruling
Extension of stay in debtor's sixth chapter 13 case denied due to bad faith.
Procedural posture

Chapter 13 debtor filed a motion for an extension of the automatic stay as to all creditors pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(c)(3)(B).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Fitzpatrick Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 07, 2011 , LexisNexis #1011-074

In re Contino

Ruling
Presumption of Bad Faith.
Procedural posture

The chapter 7 debtors filed a motion for extension of the automatic stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(c)(3). A mechanics lien creditor opposed the motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Contino Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 20, 2011 , LexisNexis #0911-110

Chorzepa, In re

Ruling
Retroactive annulment of automatic stay was unnecessary as the stay had elapsed before theinitiation and completion of the foreclosure sale. (Bankr. D. Nev.)
Issue(s)
Automatic Stay; Duration; Cases Refiled Within One Year of Dismissal of One Prior Case; Termination of Stay on 30th Day.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Chorzepa, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 05, 2011 , LexisNexis #0618-067

In re Jackola

Ruling
Extension of stay in debtor's second case in one year denied for lack of good faith due to lack of realistic hope of confirming plan.
Procedural posture

Before the court was the Chapter 13 debtor's motion to extend the automatic stay. The decision concerned whether debtor was entitled to an extension of the automatic stay in this case, her second case pending in the last year, and, if the stay was not extended, to what extent the stay was terminated. A creditor opposed the motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Jackola Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 22, 2011 , LexisNexis #0711-110

In re Jackson

Ruling
Debtor's third case filed prior to dismissal of second case for failure to comply with credit counseling requirement dismissed as an abuse of the bankruptcy system.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed a petition under chapter 13, and a trustee who was appointed to administer the debtor's bankruptcy case filed a motion to dismiss the case and asked the court to issue an order requiring the debtor's counsel to disgorge his fees and imposing sanctions on the debtor's counsel pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9011.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Jackson Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 04, 2011 , LexisNexis #0411-004