Skip to main content

§ 345(b)

Cottonwood Fin., In re

Ruling
Debtors were authorized, but not directed, to designate, maintain, close, and continue to usetheir existing bank accounts. (Bankr. N.D. Tex.)
Issue(s)
Money of Estates; Requirements of Non-U.S. Guaranteed Entities with Which Deposit or

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Cottonwood Fin., In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on March 19, 2024 , LexisNexis #0524-080

King Mt. Tobacco Co., In re

Ruling
Cause existed to allow Chapter 11 debtor to continue using its existing cash managementsystems and accounts. (Bankr. E.D. Wash.)
Issue(s)
Money of Estates; Requirements of Non-U.S. Guaranteed Entities with Which Deposit or

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of King Mt. Tobacco Co., In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on November 23, 2020 , LexisNexis #0121-026

Diocese of Buffalo, In re

Ruling
Court authorized the debtor to maintain its pre-petition fund investments in the fund, waivingthe requirements under § 345(b). (Bankr. W.D.N.Y.)
Issue(s)
Money of Estates; Requirements of Non-U.S. Guaranteed Entities with Which Deposit or

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Diocese of Buffalo, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on October 30, 2020 , LexisNexis #1220-079

Ditech Holding Corp., In re

Ruling
Debtors failed to establish cause to excuse them from collateralizing five bank accounts.(Bankr. S.D.N.Y.)
Issue(s)
Money of Estates; Requirements of Non-U.S. Guaranteed Entities with Which Deposit or

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ditech Holding Corp., In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on June 24, 2019 , LexisNexis #0819-077