Skip to main content

§ 342(g)(2)

Seebeck, In re

Ruling
Creditor was not properly notified of a debtor's Chapter 13 case and debtor did not meet hisburden of proving that the creditor willfully violated the automatic stay. (Bankr. W.D. Tenn.)
Issue(s)
Notice; When Notice to Creditor is Effective; When Penalties May Be Imposed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Seebeck, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 23, 2024 , LexisNexis #0624-078

Walsh v. UGI Utils. Inc. (In re Walsh)

Ruling
Safe harbor did not apply to creditor utility's shut-off notice once creditor had actual knowledge of debtor's bankruptcy.
Issue(s)
Should debtor's complaint for violation of stay against utility company be dismissed on grounds that the utility's actions were covered by the safe harbor provision?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Walsh v. UGI Utils. Inc. (In re Walsh) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 03, 2014 , LexisNexis #1014-112