Skip to main content

§ 341(a)

Argon Credit, LLC, In re

Ruling
Debtors were not required to appear and be examined to the continuation meeting of creditorsas the mandatory meeting of creditors was convened and concluded tby the original trustee.(Bankr. N.D. Ill.)
Issue(s)
Meetings of Creditors and Equity Security Holders; Convene Within Reasonable Time.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Argon Credit, LLC, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on October 02, 2017 , LexisNexis #1117-034

In re Holland

Ruling
Life insurance proceeds received more than 180 days postpetition were not property of the estate and failure to schedule justified by debtor's belief she was not a beneficiary.
Procedural posture

A chapter 7 trustee objected to a debtor's claimed exemptions of her shares of stock in a life insurance company and of the cash surrender value of a life insurance policy.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Holland Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 17, 2008 , LexisNexis #0209-136

Peres v. Sherman (In re Peres)

Ruling
Creditor's meeting concluded on date to which meeting was continued despite lack of formal written notice.
Procedural posture

Appellant debtors sought judicial review of the decision by the District Court for the Northern District of Texas affirming a bankruptcy court's order granting the trustee's objections to their exemptions. In a matter of first impression, the question was: if no formal announcement of a continuation date was made, when was an 11 U.S.C.S. § 341(a) creditors' meeting concluded?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Peres v. Sherman (In re Peres) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 06, 2008 , LexisNexis #0708-001