Skip to main content

§ 307

In re Oliver

Ruling
U.S. Trustee had standing to examine debtor.
Issue(s)
Could debtor strike a court-ordered Rule 2004 examination by U.S. Trustee as moot?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Oliver Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 26, 2016 , LexisNexis #0616-072

In re Burrows

Ruling
United States Trustee had standing to object to proof of claim.
Procedural posture

In a chapter 13 case, the United States Trustee (UST) objected to a proof of claim, to which neither the debtor nor the chapter 13 trustee objected. The creditor challenged the standing of the UST to object to its claim.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Burrows Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 22, 2011 , LexisNexis #0411-001

In re Cespedes

Ruling
Liability for early withdrawal from IRA was a penalty, not a tax, and not a priority claim.
Procedural posture

The IRS filed a proof of claim in a debtor's chapter 13 bankruptcy case for a 10 percent early withdrawal liability incurred by the debtor pursuant to 26 U.S.C.S. § 72(t). The debtor objected to the classification of the liability as a priority claim under 11 U.S.C.S. § 507(a)(8)(E), asserting that the claim was a general unsecured claim.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Cespedes Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 08, 2008 , LexisNexis #1008-036