Skip to main content

§ 1322

In re Fells

Ruling
Lien on mobile home that was debtors' principal residence could not be bifurcated.
Procedural posture

The debtors filed for relief under chapter 13 and submitted a proposed plan. A creditor filed an objection to the proposed plan. The court issued findings of fact and conclusions of law.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Fells Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 23, 2007 , LexisNexis #1207-057

In re Oliveira

Ruling
Security interest in manufactured home but not in underlying real property was not protected from modification.
Procedural posture

Two debtors filed separate actions under chapter 13, and plans for repaying their creditors. A creditor filed an objection to both plans, claiming that the debtors should not be allowed to bifurcate a secured claim the creditor held on each home into secured and unsecured portions because the debtors used the homes as their principal residence.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Oliveira Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 12, 2007 , LexisNexis #0108-017

In re Oliveira

Ruling
Loans secured by security interest in manufactured homes, but not real property on which they were situated, were not protected from bifurcation.
Procedural posture

A creditor objected to the confirmation of debtors' chapter 13 plans proposed in their respective cases. The creditor contended that its debts, which were secured only by perfected security interests in the debtors'manufactured homes but not by the real property upon which the homes were situated, was protected from modification under 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(2).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Oliveira Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 11, 2007 , LexisNexis #1107-085

Frazer v. Drummond (In re Frazer)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court erred in holding debtors were required to cure default under real estate contract within 60 days of filing.
Procedural posture

Appellant debtors filed a petition under chapter 13, and a plan for paying their creditors. Appellees, a trustee who was appointed to represent the bankruptcy estate and a creditor, filed objections to the debtors'amended plan for paying their creditors, and the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Montana sustained the objections and denied confirmation. The debtors appealed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Frazer v. Drummond (In re Frazer) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 27, 2007 , LexisNexis #1107-084

In re Bartolome

Ruling
Claim secured by mobile home that was not real property under state law was not protected from bifurcation.
Procedural posture

A creditor filed an objection to confirmation of debtor's chapter 13 plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bartolome Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 21, 2007 , LexisNexis #1007-124

In re Lasowski

Ruling
Plan confirmed over trustee's objection as court could not require proration of 401(k) loan payments even though loans would be paid off before plan completion.
Procedural posture

A chapter 13 trustee objected to the confirmation of the plan of an above- median debtor. Because the debtor would pay off her 401(k) loan obligations before the completion of the proposed plan, the trustee objected to the debtor claiming a full deduction for the monthly loan payments.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Lasowski Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 14, 2007 , LexisNexis #1007-092

In re Hendrick

Ruling
Court declined to extend date for plan completion to allow for discharge where debtor had missed seven payments.
Procedural posture

Debtor asked the court to exercise its equitable powers to allow her to obtain a chapter 13 discharge by extending the date for completion of her chapter 13 plan payments. The chapter 13 trustee moved to dismiss the case, alleging that she was $15,000 in arrears on her payments.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Hendrick Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on September 04, 2007 , LexisNexis #1007-032

In re Edmunds

Ruling
Lien on property in which there was equity could not be modified.
Procedural posture

A creditor held a judgment lien against the debtors. The debtors filed a motion to strip off the lien pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 522(f). The debtors contended that the lien impaired their homestead exemption. The debtors further contended that the creditor's claim was unsecured and thus could be stripped off under section 522(f).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Edmunds Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on August 31, 2007 , LexisNexis #1007-012

In re McLain

Ruling
Whether a mobile home is to be considered real property is determined by state law.
Procedural posture

The debtor filed for relief under chapter 13. The debtor owned a mobile home and the creditor was listed as the secured creditor for the mobile home. The creditor objected to the debtor's proposed chapter 13 plan, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(2).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re McLain Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on August 30, 2007 , LexisNexis #1007-013

In re Bardell

Ruling
Prepetition foreclosure terminated debtor's right to cure default through plan.
Procedural posture

Debtor had defaulted on his mortgage loan, and a trustee under a deed of trust conducted a foreclosure sale. Two days later, debtor filed for chapter 13 relief. Debtor sought to undo the foreclosure sale and cure his mortgage arrearage in his proposed plan. The Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of West Virginia ruled debtor was not entitled to cure his mortgage default or to avoid the prepetition foreclosure sale. Debtor appealed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bardell Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on August 10, 2007 , LexisNexis #0907-088