Skip to main content

§ 1123(a)(4)

Diocese of Rochester, In re

Ruling
Competing disclosure statements from debtor diocese, creditors' committee, and insurer werenot approved as they did not sufficiently detail abuse claim settlements under the bankruptcyplan. (Bankr. W.D.N.Y.)
Issue(s)
Contents of Plan; Mandatory Provisions; Equality of Treatment of Claims or Interests

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Diocese of Rochester, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on February 16, 2024 , LexisNexis #0424-046

Glaukom, LLC, In re

Ruling
No discrimination was made as debtor's plan for reorganization provided the sametreatment for each claim and equity interest in class unless the holder of a particular claimor equity interest agreed to lesser treatment. (Bankr. D. Utah)
Issue(s)
Contents of Plan; Mandatory Provisions; Equality of Treatment of Claims or Interests

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Glaukom, LLC, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 19, 2022 , LexisNexis #0922-016

Peabody Energy Corp., In re

Ruling
Plan providing participating creditors the opportunity to participate in a private placement didnot violate the equal treatment rule. (8th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Contents of Plan; Mandatory Provisions; Equality of Treatment of Claims or Interests

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Peabody Energy Corp., In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 09, 2019 , LexisNexis #1019-019

In re AMR Corp.

Ruling
Claimants entitled to receive payments in the form of stock where a share-based payment wasconsistent with the terms of the chapter 11 plan. (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.)
Issue(s)
Contents of Plan; Mandatory Provisions; Equality of Treatment of Claims or Interests within Class.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re AMR Corp. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on December 23, 2016 , LexisNexis #0117-113

In re Washington Mutual Inc.

Ruling
Confirmation denied due to necessary modifications to debtor bank's final settlement with FDIC, another bank and the creditor.
Procedural posture

Debtors filed petitions under chapter 11 and proposed a joint plan for reorganizing their businesses that incorporated a global settlement with a bank, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC"), and various creditors. The plan was opposed by the United States Trustee and parties that had filed claims against the debtors' bankruptcy estates. The court held hearings on the plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Washington Mutual Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on January 07, 2011 , LexisNexis #0211-028

ACC Bondholder Group v. Adelphia Communs. Corp. (In re Adelphia Communs. Corp.)

Ruling
Stay pending appeal granted where appellants' arguments that plan did not satisfy best interests of creditors test had substantial probability of success.
Procedural posture

In an action arising out of jointly administered chapter 11 cases of a parent company and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the debtors), appellant objectors, who were holders of notes issued by the parent company, filed a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8005 for a stay pending appeal and an expedited appeal with respect to a bankruptcy court's confirmation order approving the debtors'chapter 11 reorganization plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of ACC Bondholder Group v. Adelphia Communs. Corp. (In re Adelphia Communs. Corp.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on January 24, 2007 , LexisNexis #0307-066