Skip to main content

§ 1101

Abengoa Bioenergy Biomass of Kan., LLC, In re--Drivetrain, LLC v. Kozel

Ruling
District court appropriately found that the plan of liquidation implicated multipletransactions that could not be unwound without substantial cost and delay. (10th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Definitions for This Chapter; ``Substantial Consummation''.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Abengoa Bioenergy Biomass of Kan., LLC, In re--Drivetrain, LLC v. Kozel Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on May 05, 2020 , LexisNexis #0620-095

Ochadleus v. City of Detroit (In re City of Detroit)

Ruling
Equitable mootness applies equally in chapter 11 and chapter 9. (6th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Does equitable mootness apply to chapter 9 cases just as it applies to chapter 11?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ochadleus v. City of Detroit (In re City of Detroit) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on October 03, 2016 , LexisNexis #1016-131

One2One Communs. LLC v. QuadGraphics Inc.

Ruling
District court erred in dismissing creditor's appeal of plan confirmation as equitably moot where the plan was not close to substantial consummation.
Issue(s)
Did the district court err in dismissing creditor's appeal of confirmation order as equitably moot?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of One2One Communs. LLC v. QuadGraphics Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on July 21, 2015 , LexisNexis #0815-061

Alsohaibi v. Arcapita Bank B.S.C.(c) (In re Arcapita Bank B.S.C.(c))

Ruling
Creditor's appeal of confirmation was moot due to substantial consummation.
Issue(s)
Should appeal of order approving replacement debtor-in-possession financing and confirmation order be set aside as moot given substantial consummation of plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Alsohaibi v. Arcapita Bank B.S.C.(c) (In re Arcapita Bank B.S.C.(c)) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on January 06, 2013 , LexisNexis #0114-135

In re RADCO Props. Inc.

Ruling
Confirmation denied due to improper attempt to set time limit for substantial consummation based solely on distribution.
Procedural posture

A debtor sought confirmation of an amended chapter 11 plan of reorganization and approval of a second amended disclosure statement.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re RADCO Props. Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on March 09, 2009 , LexisNexis #0509-051

In re Ball

Ruling
Individual chapter 11 case could not be closed despite substantial consummation where payments were still owed to objecting creditor.
Procedural posture

Pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3022, an individual chapter 11 debtor asked the court to grant him a discharge, close his chapter 11 case, and enter an injunction on the ground that all payments under his confirmed chapter 11 plan had been made. A foundation and an administrator of certain decedents' estates (objectors) interposed objections to the motion on the ground that they had not been paid in full.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Ball Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 23, 2008 , LexisNexis #0608-120

In re Price

Ruling
Motion for modification denied on grounds of substantial completion.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed a motion to modify her confirmed chapter 11 plan. Two creditors objected to the motion, asserting, among other things, that the debtor could not seek to modify her plan post-confirmation because her confirmed plan had been substantially consummated, and that the debtor failed to demonstrate that the plan as modified was feasible.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Price Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 08, 2008 , LexisNexis #0608-067

Buckeye Ret. Co. LLC v. Crews

Ruling
Appeal of settlement dismissed due to substantial consummation of plan where creditor had not sought a stay pending appeal.
Procedural posture

Appellant creditor sought review of an order of the bankruptcy court approving a compromise between a chapter 7 debtor and appellee trustee and overruling the creditor's objection. The settlement dismissed discharge and avoidance adversaries and provided the debtor with a release in exchange for the payment of a certain sum. The trustee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as moot.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Buckeye Ret. Co. LLC v. Crews Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on July 03, 2007 , LexisNexis #0807-066

G.E. Cattle Co. v. United Producres Inc. (In re United Producers Inc.)

Ruling
Appeal of plan confirmation dismissed as moot due to substantial consummation.
Procedural posture

Appellants, holders of prepetition judgments against one of appellee debtors for fraud, breach of contract, conversion, and Packers and Stockyards Act violations, objected to debtors'amended plan. They challenged the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio's orders finding that the plan met all the confirmation standards, and confirming the plan. Debtors moved to dismiss the appeal as equitably moot.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of G.E. Cattle Co. v. United Producres Inc. (In re United Producers Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on October 06, 2006 , LexisNexis #1106-130

Elixir Indus. v. City Bank & Trust

Ruling
Creditor's lien was extinguished due to substantial consummation of plan.
Procedural posture

Before the court was an appeal from the final order of the bankruptcy court, which reduced a claim to a general non-priority claim for $40,961.53.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Elixir Indus. v. City Bank & Trust Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on August 24, 2006 , LexisNexis #1006-063