Skip to main content

§ 109(f)

Vera T. Welte Testamentary Trust, In re

Ruling
Chapter 12 petition filed by a trust was dismissed as the debtor was an ordinary testamentarytrust, not a business trust, and therefore it was not an eligible debtor. (Bankr. N.D. Iowa)
Issue(s)
Who May Be a Debtor; Chapter 12.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Vera T. Welte Testamentary Trust, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on June 03, 2024 , LexisNexis #0824-001

Bussmann, In re

Ruling
Debtor was not eligible for Chapter 12 relief as he did not qualify as a family farmer in that a majority of his debts did not arise out of a farming operation. (Bankr. D. Or.)
Issue(s)
Who May Be a Debtor; Chapter 12.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bussmann, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 31, 2023 , LexisNexis #0523-078

Hoel, In re

Ruling
Debtors did not satisfy Chapter 12 eligibility requirements as their horse boarding activity did not constitute a farming operation and did not bear the risks of fluctuations in market prices and upkeep costs. (Bankr. W.D. Wis.)
Issue(s)
Who May Be a Debtor; Chapter 12.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hoel, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 20, 2020 , LexisNexis #0820-076

In re Snyder-Myrstol

Ruling
Chapter 12 case dismissed where debtor did not earn more than 50 percent of gross income from farming.
Issue(s)
Was debtor who raised horses and chickens and sold eggs an eligible chapter 12 debtor?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Snyder-Myrstol Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 18, 2015 , LexisNexis #0815-107

In re McLawchlin

Ruling
Debtor not engaged in farming operation for three years was ineligible under chapter 12 but could convert to chapter 13.
Issue(s)
Was debtor who was a rice farmer from 1976 until 2010, when he became disabled, eligible as a chapter 12 debtor in 2013?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re McLawchlin Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 05, 2014 , LexisNexis #0714-106

In re Vecchione

Ruling
Debtor engaged in agrotourism was not eligible under chapter 12.
Issue(s)
Was debtor engaged in agritourism business an eligible chapter 12 debtor?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Vecchione Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 25, 2013 , LexisNexis #1213-071

In re Acee

Ruling
Debtor was not a family farmer eligible under chapter 12 as less than half of debts were farm debts.
Issue(s)
Did debtor whose income was derived from an extensive clay pigeon shooting range, gun club, pistol range, stocked pheasant hunts, and other related recreational activities, and who had disposed of significant farming assets eligible as a family farmer under chapter 12.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Acee Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 12, 2013 , LexisNexis #1213-001

In re Cabral

Ruling
Chapter 12 debtor's third case in 29 months dismissed with 180 day filing bar due to debts in excess of limits and bad faith.
Procedural posture

Debtors Antonio filed three chapter 12 bankruptcies in the last 29 months. A creditor moved to dismiss the third bankruptcy and sought a 180 day filing bar.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Cabral Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 03, 2013 , LexisNexis #0713-071

In re Degour

Ruling
Debtors were ineligible for chapter 12 relief where less than one half of income was from farming, if gross income from S-corp was counted.
Procedural posture

A chapter 12 trustee filed a motion to dismiss the debtors' case on the grounds that they were not eligible for chapter 12 relief under 11 U.S.C.S. §§ 109(f) and 101(18). A creditor supported the trustee's motion, while the debtors opposed the motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Degour Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 24, 2012 , LexisNexis #0912-106

In re Cooper

Ruling
Debtor in possession whose Christmas tree business provided majority of gross income was not eligible for chapter 12 relief.
Procedural posture

Two creditors filed objections to confirmation of a Chapter 12 modified plan proposed by the debtors-in-possession (DIPs).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Cooper Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 02, 2011 , LexisNexis #1011-001