Trantham v. Tate
Aug
13
2024
Ruling
Bankruptcy court erred in denying confirmation on the ground that a debtor's proposedvesting provision was contrary to its required form plan as it denied the debtor her right topropose a plan of her own choosing. (4th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Effect of Confirmation; Vesting of Property in Estate of Debtor.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Trantham v. Tate Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available