Skip to main content

Herremans, In re

Herremans, In re

Ruling
Motion to reconsider the determination that punitive damages were not warranted forviolation of the automatic stay was denied as the motion was nothing more than an improperattempt to re-argue issues that were already decided. (Bankr. W.D. Mich.)
Issue(s)
New Trials; Amendment of Judgments.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Herremans, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 11, 2023 , LexisNexis #1023-025