Smith, In re--Smith v. Citizens Fin. Grp., Inc.

Bankruptcy court abstained from hearing complaint where it could not determine whether res judicata applied and a ruling on the merits would disturb the prior state court judgment regardless of the applicability of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. (Bankr. D. Md.)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Discretionary Abstention.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Smith, In re--Smith v. Citizens Fin. Grp., Inc.. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 12,2018, LexisNexis #1018-117