Skip to main content

Baroni v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In re Baroni)

Baroni v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In re Baroni)

Ruling
Attorneys’ fees incurred by creditor in defending adversary proceeding were subject todischarge. (Bankr. C.D. Cal.)
Issue(s)
Were bank attorneys' fees pursuant to a fee-shifting provision in the prepetition loan documents on which bank asserted its claim subject to discharge?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Baroni v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In re Baroni) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 30, 2016 , LexisNexis #1016-133