Skip to main content

In re D&H Mach. Serv.

In re D&H Mach. Serv.

Ruling
Debtor’s counsel not entitled to fees for undisclosed prepetition services. (Bankr. E.D. Tenn.)
Issue(s)
Should debtor’s counsel be allowed fees for previously undisclosed prepetition services?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re D&H Mach. Serv. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on September 09, 2016 , LexisNexis #1016-003