Skip to main content

Ring v. First Niagra Bank (In re Sterling United Inc.)

Ring v. First Niagra Bank (In re Sterling United Inc.)

Ruling
Convoluted collateral description in series of UCC filings was not "seriously misleading" with respect to trustee and was not grounds for avoidance.
Issue(s)
Whether a needlessly convoluted description of collateral in a succession of U.C.C. financing statements causes a claim of security to fail as "seriously misleading" under N.Y. U.C.C. Law § 9-506.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ring v. First Niagra Bank (In re Sterling United Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on October 03, 2014 , LexisNexis #1014-129