Skip to main content

In re Hight

In re Hight

Ruling
Objection to mortgagee's proof of claim sustained with regard to alleged escrow shortage and a portion of pre- and postpetition fees.
Procedural posture

A mortgagee secured by a bankruptcy debtor's real property submitted a proof of claim in the debtor's bankruptcy for the principal of the mortgage loan, arrearages, late charges, property preservation/inspection fees, pre-petition attorney fees and costs, escrow shortage, and post- pertition attorney fees. The debtor objected to the mortgagee's proof of claim.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Hight Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 13, 2008 , LexisNexis #1008-018