- 11 U.S.C.
Los Alamos Natl Bank v. Potter (In re Potter)
Aug
13
2007
Ruling
Attorney sanctioned for filing action against creditor bank in violation of stay.
Procedural posture
Plaintiff bank filed a motion for an order holding defendant attorney in contempt of court and imposing sanctions. The bank claimed that the attorney violated an order the bankruptcy court issued, and also violated the automatic stay imposed by 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(3), when he filed a lawsuit against the bank in federal district court in California.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Los Alamos Natl Bank v. Potter (In re Potter) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: