Skip to main content

Hebbring v. United States Trustee

Hebbring v. United States Trustee

Ruling
Bankruptcy court did not err in dismissing case for substantial abuse based on finding that retirement contributions were not reasonably necessary expenses.
Procedural posture

Appellant debtor sought review of an order from the District Court for the District of Nevada, which affirmed the bankruptcy court's decision to grant appellee United States Trustee's motion to dismiss the debtor's chapter 7 bankruptcy petition for substantial abuse under 11 U.S.C. § 707(b) based on a finding that the debtor's contributions to her 401(k) plan and savings bond were not reasonably necessary expenses.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hebbring v. United States Trustee Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on September 11, 2006 , LexisNexis #1006-025