Skip to main content

Herremans, In re--Herremans v. Fedo

Herremans, In re--Herremans v. Fedo

Ruling
Punitive damages were not appropriate as the conduct of defendant or his counsel in seeking amoney judgment against debtor in state court was not egregious, vindictive, or intentionallymalicious. (Bankr. W.D. Mich.)
Issue(s)
Automatic Stay; Remedies for Violation; Damages For Willful Violation of Stay.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Herremans, In re--Herremans v. Fedo Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 18, 2023 , LexisNexis #0923-031