Skip to main content

Jurgens, In re--Martin v. Jurgens

Jurgens, In re--Martin v. Jurgens

Ruling
Debt owed to plaintiff was nondischargeable as she abused her position as a fiduciary both aspower of attorney and executor of the decedents’ estates. (Bankr. D. Mont.)
Issue(s)
Exceptions to Discharge; Types of Debt Excepted; Fiduciary Fraud, Embezzlement, or

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Jurgens, In re--Martin v. Jurgens Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 30, 2020 , LexisNexis #0920-038