Skip to main content

Kain v. Beneficial South Carolina Inc. (In re Kain)

Kain v. Beneficial South Carolina Inc. (In re Kain)

Ruling
Mortgage could not be treated as unsecured as it was treated as secured by confirmed plan.
Procedural posture

Debtors filed a complaint asking the court: (1) to find, under 11 U.S.C.S. § 506(d), that defendant creditor had no secured interest in certain property; (2) to order the creditor to cancel a mortgage upon entry of a discharge order; (3) to order the chapter 13 trustee to treat the creditor's claim as unsecured; and (4) for attorney's fees. An entry of default was recorded against the creditor. The debtors moved for a default judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Kain v. Beneficial South Carolina Inc. (In re Kain) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 02, 2011 , LexisNexis #0911-118