Skip to main content

Poteet v. eCAST Settlement Corp. (In re Poteet)

Poteet v. eCAST Settlement Corp. (In re Poteet)

Ruling
Filing of proof of claim omitting supporting documentation did not violate stay.
Procedural posture

Defendant creditor filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff debtors' complaint, which alleged a gross violation of the automatic stay, 11 U.S.C.S. § 362, that defective proofs of claim filed by the creditor gave rise to a right to monetary damages and legal fees under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3001(c), that the creditor violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C.S. §§ 1692-1692p.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Poteet v. eCAST Settlement Corp. (In re Poteet) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 17, 2011 , LexisNexis #0911-037