Skip to main content

Itkin & Sabadash, In re

Itkin & Sabadash, In re

Ruling
Court found that abstention was warranted as there was an earlier filed Chapter 15 case involving the same estate as the alleged partnership. (Bankr. C.D. Cal.)
Issue(s)
Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Itkin & Sabadash, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 16, 2025 , LexisNexis #0825-077