Skip to main content

In re Perl

In re Perl

Ruling
Purchaser of debtor's property at foreclosure sale violated the automatic stay by allowing sheriff to change the locks and evict debtor.
Issue(s)
Did the bankruptcy court properly hold that the postpetition lockout and eviction by a sheriff of the debtor from his residence, made at the request of foreclosure purchaser of the property, and not halted after notice of petition, violated the automatic stay?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Perl Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 30, 2014 , LexisNexis #0814-041