Skip to main content

Clyde Bergeman Inc. v. Sullivan (In re Sullivan)

Clyde Bergeman Inc. v. Sullivan (In re Sullivan)

Ruling
Collateral estoppel operated to render state court embezzlement judgment nondischargeable.
Procedural posture

Creditor and debtor, plaintiff's ex-employee, sought summary judgment on claims that a federal district court judgment confirming an arbitration award against debtor was nondischargeable per 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(4) and (a)(6). The judgment had awarded damages to plaintiff on findings that debtor and others had misappropriated plaintiff's trade secrets in violation of the Oregon Trade Secrets Act (OTSA), Or. Rev. Stat. § 646.461 et seq.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Clyde Bergeman Inc. v. Sullivan (In re Sullivan) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 20, 2011 , LexisNexis #0811-015