Skip to main content

Suncoast Credit Union v. Dukes (In re Dukes)

Suncoast Credit Union v. Dukes (In re Dukes)

Ruling
Chapter 13 plan that referenced payment of mortgage debt outside of the plan left the debt unaffected.
Issue(s)
Whether debtor's chapter 13 Plan "provided for" mortgage holder's claims when its only reference to those claims was that debtor would pay them directly to mortgage holder.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Suncoast Credit Union v. Dukes (In re Dukes) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 18, 2015 , LexisNexis #0715-061