Skip to main content

Mercury Cos. v. Comerica Bank

Mercury Cos. v. Comerica Bank

Ruling
Debtor that did not reserve state law claims did not retain them postconfirmation.
Issue(s)
Could debtor that had not reserved state law claims pursue them after confirmation of chapter 11 plan?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mercury Cos. v. Comerica Bank Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on July 08, 2014 , LexisNexis #0714-022