Skip to main content

Coley v. Thomas (In re Thomas)

Coley v. Thomas (In re Thomas)

Ruling
Provision of name of bankruptcy counsel did not give creditor actual notice of case so as to prevent late-filed proof of claim.
Procedural posture

Creditor filed an adversary proceeding alleging that debt owed to her by debtor was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(6). Debtor moved to dismiss the complaint on the basis that it was untimely under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 4007(c).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Coley v. Thomas (In re Thomas) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 03, 2013 , LexisNexis #0713-138