Skip to main content

In re Churchill

In re Churchill

Ruling
Confirmation denied due to understatement of projected disposable income.
Procedural posture

Debtor moved for confirmation of his second amended plan. The chapter 13 trustee objected to confirmation of the plan, claiming that debtor understated his projected disposable income in violation of 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325(b)(1)(B).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Churchill Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 06, 2013 , LexisNexis #0713-066