Skip to main content

In re Patterson

In re Patterson

Ruling
Debtor not entitled to reinstatement of insurance policy cancelled prior to petition date.
Procedural posture

Before the court was debtor's motion which appeared to seek (1) reinstatement of a cancelled automobile insurance policy with the insurer, and (2) a discharge of the amount due under a renter's insurance policy with the insurer, or in the alternative, reinstatement of a previous renters insurance policy. No written objection to the motion was filed, and the insurer did not appear at the hearing to contest the motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Patterson Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 19, 2010 , LexisNexis #0710-003