Skip to main content

Dietz v. Langlie (In re Farr)

Dietz v. Langlie (In re Farr)

Ruling
Repayment of funds mistakenly paid to debtor contractor by creditor's bank could be avoided.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff appealed from a judgment of the bankruptcy court for the District of Minnesota, which held that funds previously held in the debtor's bank account were held subject to a constructive trust in favor of defendant creditor. The trustee argued that the funds were an asset of the debtor and that the pre-bankruptcy payment of the funds to the creditor was a preferential or fraudulent transfer.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Dietz v. Langlie (In re Farr) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 08, 2009 , LexisNexis #0709-089