Skip to main content

In re Griffin

In re Griffin

Ruling
Domestic support obligations being collected by state were priority claims that were required to be paid in full during term of plan.
Procedural posture

A debtor filed for relief under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code, and submitted a proposed plan. The Alabama Department of Human Resources (DHR) objected to the confirmation of the proposed plan, claiming that pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 507, the DHR's priority claims needed to be paid in full during the term of the plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Griffin Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 30, 2008 , LexisNexis #0708-089