Skip to main content

In re Marble

In re Marble

Ruling
Attorney who was trustee of spendthrift trust of which debtor was beneficiary was not disqualified from representing debtor.
Procedural posture

Debtors filed a petition under chapter 11. An attorney they hired to represent them filed a motion to approve his employment and the employment of his law firm, and the trustee in bankruptcy filed an objection to the motion, suggesting that the attorney and his law firm had a conflict of interest and did not satisfy the requirements of 11 U.S.C. § 327(a).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Marble Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on May 25, 2007 , LexisNexis #0707-002