- 11 U.S.C.
In re Vinnie
Jun
23
2006
Ruling
Plan was confirmed over creditor's objection since section 1326(b)(1) did not require full payment of creditor's higher priority claim before paying other creditors.
Procedural posture
A state agency in charge of collecting child support on behalf of child support payees (agency) filed three claims for child support. The debtor's chapter 13 plan proposed to pay these claims in full, concurrently with other priority claims, including the debtor's attorney. The agency filed an objection to confirmation, claiming that its priority claims should be paid in full before distribution to any other priority creditor.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Vinnie Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: