- 11 U.S.C.
In re Fuger
Jun
29
2006
Ruling
Trustee's objection to confirmation was denied and section 1325(b)(1)(B)'s "applicable commitment period" language was interpreted as serving as both temporal and monetary requirement.
Procedural posture
The matter before the court was the continued hearing on confirmation of the debtors'proposed chapter 13 plan. Specifically, the court was called upon to determine whether the "applicable commitment period"in 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1)(B) was a monetary or temporal requirement.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Fuger Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: