Skip to main content

Anzaldua v. Rosenbrook

Anzaldua v. Rosenbrook

Ruling
Motion for continuation of stay denied as the timing of counsel's filing of the motion forcontinuation of stay and his failure to comply prevented the bankruptcy court fromcompleting the "notice and a hearing" within the 30-day statutory period. (Bankr. W.D. Mich.)
Issue(s)
Automatic Stay; Duration; Cases Refiled Within One Year of Dismissal of One Prior

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Anzaldua v. Rosenbrook Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 11, 2024 , LexisNexis #0624-054