Skip to main content

Albert-Sheridan, In re--Albert-Sheridan v. State Bar

Albert-Sheridan, In re--Albert-Sheridan v. State Bar

Ruling
Bankruptcy court properly denied leave to amend after considering that the first adversary andthe consolidated adversary proceedings had been pending for three years and the debtoralready had made two full attempts to plead legally sufficient claims for relief. (B.A.P. 9th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Automatic Stay; Scope; Acts to Collect, Assess or Recover Claims.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Albert-Sheridan, In re--Albert-Sheridan v. State Bar Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 02, 2024 , LexisNexis #0624-004