Skip to main content

Malmborg, In re

Malmborg, In re

Ruling
Permissive abstention was appropriate as it was more efficient to have the state court determine liability and damages debtor owed to creditor before the bankruptcy court considered vacating the confirmation order. (Bankr. N.D. Ill.)
Issue(s)
Effect of Confirmation; Parties Bound by Confirmed Plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Malmborg, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 04, 2023 , LexisNexis #0623-097